🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have voted to withdraw from an international accord designed to safeguard women from violence, including family violence, following extensive and intense debates in the parliament.

Thousands of demonstrators assembled in Riga this past week to voice disagreement with the decision. The final authority now rests with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to endorse or reject the legislation.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only took effect in Latvia last twelve months ago, mandating governments to establish legal frameworks and assistance programs to end all types of abuse.

Latvia has become the first European Union member to initiate the process of exiting from the convention. The transcontinental nation pulled out in two years ago, a decision that rights groups described as a significant regression for women's rights.

Ideological Controversy and Opposition

The international agreement was approved by the European Union in 2023, yet traditionalist groups have contended that its focus on equal rights undermines family values and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy debate in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers decided by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the convention, a move sponsored by political opponents but backed by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a setback for centre-right Prime Minister the nation's PM, who joined demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse will not prevail," she declared to the crowd.

Ideological Disagreements and Responses

One of the primary parties supporting the exit is a nationalist party, whose leader has urged citizens to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

Latvia's ombudswoman Karina Palkova urged the treaty not to be politicized, while the group the rights organization asserted it was "not a threat to national principles, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The recent decision has provoked widespread protest both inside Latvia and abroad.

22,000 people have endorsed a Latvian appeal demanding the treaty to be maintained. The women's rights organization the rights center has announced a protest for next Thursday, accusing MPs of disregarding the wishes of the Latvian people.

International Worries and Possible Future Actions

The leader of the European organization's parliamentary assembly stated that the Baltic state had made a hasty decision fueled by false information. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning step backward for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation left the treaty in 2021, cases of femicide and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not secure a supermajority majority, the president could potentially send back the bill for additional consideration if he has objections.

Head of State Rinkevics announced on social media that he would evaluate the decision according to legal requirements, "considering state and legal considerations, instead of belief-based viewpoints".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the Progressives, suggested it would not exclude petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a concerning situation for gender equality not only in Latvia but throughout Europe," commented a human rights activist.

• Family violence rates have been rising in multiple European nations
• The Istanbul Convention requires particular legal protections for victims of gender-based violence
• The nation's decision could affect similar discussions in other EU countries